![]() They will use textured paintbrushes for a specific effect, such as the difference between the light fluffy clouds and dark mountain rocks. Skilled artists will use different techniques, like the way they move the paintbrush, the pressure they exert or the direction of the brush. Freidrich leverages different colors, textures, shapes, and symbols to evoke a feeling in the viewer. This is why this image has become the face of Romanticism.īut what about the images demonstrate the artists’ superior skills? While the second image appears to be produced with a simple doodle, and quickly composed, the first indicates more complexity, attention-to-detail, and craft. Meaning: the first image likely conjures deeper feelings, themes, or ideas, such as isolation and the primacy of nature.Lasting quality: the first image has survived the test of time, remaining popular over two hundred years!.Fame: for anyone who knows art history, the first image is famous while the other is not.Artist’s skill: it certainly appears as if the first image was produced by an artist with superior skill.This is due to several composition differences between the two works: While there may be some debate, most students usually respond that Friedrich's painting is more artistic. "Wanderer Above the Sea of Fog" by Caspar David Friedrich (1818) is in the public domain "stick figure self portrait" by marco on flickr (2019) is licensed CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 Answer So how can we differentiate between such works? A blurb about Kim Kardashian’s latest plastic surgery, most would agree, does not constitute literature. Can this be considered on the same level of literary achievement as Hamlet? Most would concede there is a difference in quality between these two texts. However, consider a story about Kim Kardashian’s plastic surgery in People Magazine. At worst, such definitions function as a means of enforcing cultural erasure. At first glance, it could seem such distinctions are, at best, arbitrary. Isn't it up to individual opinion? Anything can be literature, such students argue. Students often throw their hands up in the air over such distinctions, arguing literature is subjective. And what about the stories told through tweets, like Jennifer Egan’s “Black Box”? What about video games, like Skyrim, or memes, like Grumpy Cat? For example, while most consider Toni Morrison’s Beloved literature, others debate whether more recent publications such as David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas or Rupi Kaur’s Instagram poetry constitute literature. ![]() While works like William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird are almost universally accepted as literature, other works are hotly debated, or included or excluded based on the context. In order for us to study literature with any kind of depth, first we must decide what constitutes literature.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |